what is significant about the distinction he makes here between “a slave in form” versus “a slave in fact”?
“…however long I might remain a slave in form, the day had passed forever when I could be called a slave in fact.”
I feel that being a slave “in fact” is more of the epiphany he encounters when he gets physical with Covey the “snake” overseer. At that moment in time they are in the same level. He has stood up to that who is his boss/master and has stood his ground. By him standing up to his punisher he is no longer a slave “in fact” because he has now crossed a different line setting him apart from the common slave. As for the slave “in for” he still remains “that” slave because he still possess no real identity, by not having a last name, no father and the obvious which is not being completely “free”. In truth he remains a slave but internally he is not a slave, not a pushover and not someone’s door mat.